BILL NUMBER: AB 1093	INTRODUCED
	BILL TEXT


INTRODUCED BY   Assembly Member Eduardo Garcia

                        FEBRUARY 27, 2015

   An act to amend Sections 1234.2, 1234.3, and 1234.4 of the Penal
Code, relating to public safety, and declaring the urgency thereof,
to take effect immediately.


	LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


   AB 1093, as introduced, Eduardo Garcia. Public safety: supervised
population workforce training: grant program.
   Existing law establishes the California Workforce Investment Board
(State WIB) to assist the Governor in the development, oversight,
and improvement of the state workforce investment system and the
alignment of the education and workforce systems, as specified.
Existing law also establishes local workforce investment boards to
assist in the planning, oversight, and evaluation of local workforce
investment.
   Existing law establishes the Supervised Population Workforce
Training Grant Program to be administered by the California Workforce
Investment Board. The program awards grants on a competitive basis
to counties that propose a project that provides, at a minimum, an
education and training assessment for persons who are on probation,
mandatory supervision, or postrelease community supervision and are
supervised by, or under the jurisdiction of, a county. Existing law
establishes criteria for the grant program, including that the
education and training needs of both individuals who have some
postsecondary education, and those who require basic education and
training, are addressed. Existing law requires each project proposed
in the application for a grant to include a provision for an
education and training assessment for each individual of the
supervised population who participates in the project, and provides
that a prior assessment of an individual may be used if, in the
determination of the State WIB, its results are accurate. Existing
law requires grant recipients to report to the State WIB, at least
annually and upon completion of the grant period, regarding their use
of the funds and workforce training program outcomes. Existing law
requires, by January 1, 2018, the State WIB to submit a report to the
Legislature using the reports from the grant recipients, and
requires the report to contain specified information.
   This bill would revise the criteria for the grant program by
authorizing a grant applicant to address the education and training
needs of individuals who have some postsecondary education, or
individuals who require basic education and training, or individuals
in both categories. The bill would authorize the State WIB to
delegate the responsibility for determining the sufficiency of a
prior assessment to one or more local workforce investment boards.
The bill would also require the report to the Legislature to include
a discussion of the education and workforce readiness of the
supervised population at the time individual participants entered the
program and how this impacted the types of services needed and
offered, and whether the metrics used to evaluate the individual
grants were sufficiently aligned with the objectives of the program.
The bill would also include a statement of legislative findings and
declarations.
   This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as
an urgency statute.
   Vote: 2/3. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: no.


THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

  SECTION 1.  The Legislature finds and declares all of the
following:
   (a) Whereas, on May 23, 2011, the United States Supreme Court
ordered California to reduce its prison population to 137.5 percent
of design capacity within two years from the date of its ruling.
   (b) As of December 10, 2014, the prison population was at 140
percent of design capacity, exceeding the final February 2016
population cap by approximately 2,104 inmates.
   (c) The 2011 Public Safety Realignment, addressing public safety
and, in an effort to reduce California's prison population, shifted
to counties the responsibility for monitoring, tracking, and
incarcerating lower level offenders previously sent to state prison.
By mid-2013, more than 100,000 offenders had been diverted to county
supervision instead of going to state prisons.
   (d) On November 4, 2014, the voters of California passed
Proposition 47, which requires misdemeanor rather than felony
sentencing for certain property and drug crimes and permits inmates
previously sentenced for these reclassified crimes to petition for
resentencing. As of December 4, 2014, 132 inmates had been
resentenced and released from prison. Under this proposition, it is
estimated that the 2015-16 institution average daily population will
be reduced by approximately 1,900 inmates as a result of resentencing
and the reduction in new admissions.
   (e) Research shows that formerly incarcerated individuals do
better and remain out of prison longer when they have training and a
job with advancement opportunities. Obtaining quality jobs, however,
is not realistic for many incarcerated individuals without additional
training education. Workforce training opportunities to men and
women reentering our communities ensures that they gain training and
education, job readiness skills, and job placement assistance
required for securing necessary employment after being released from
prison. This would lower repeat offenses, and ultimately, the number
of people incarcerated, as a number of studies have proven that
people are less likely to offend or recidivate if they are gainfully
employed.
   (f) Investing in services and supports for the reentry population
is also consistent with statewide workforce goals. California's
Strategic Workforce Development Plan 2013-2017 includes the goal of
providing access to quality employment services for formally
incarcerated individuals as an overarching priority for the State
Workforce Investment Board.
  SEC. 2.  Section 1234.2 of the Penal Code is amended to read:
   1234.2.  The State WIB shall administer the grant program as
follows:
   (a) Develop criteria for the selection of grant recipients through
a public application process, including, but not limited to, the
rating and ranking of applications that meet the threshold criteria
set forth in this section.
   (b) Design the grant program application process to ensure all of
the following occurs:
   (1) Outreach and technical assistance is made available to
eligible applicants, especially to small population and rural
counties.
   (2) Grants are awarded on a competitive basis.
   (3) Small and rural counties are competitive in applying for
funds.
   (4) Applicants are encouraged to develop evidence-based, best
practices for serving the workforce training and education needs of
the supervised population.
   (5) The education and training needs of  one or  both of
the following are addressed:
   (A) Individuals with some postsecondary education who can enter
into programs and benefit from services that result in
certifications, and placement on a middle skill career ladder.
   (B) Individuals who require basic education as well as training in
order to obtain entry level jobs where there are opportunities for
career advancement.
  SEC. 3.  Section 1234.3 of the Penal Code is amended to read:
   1234.3.  (a) The grant program shall be competitively awarded
through at least two rounds of funding, with the first phase of
funding being awarded on or before May 1, 2015.
   (b) Each county is eligible to apply, and a single application may
include multiple counties applying jointly. Each application shall
include a partnership agreement between the county or counties and
one or more local workforce investment boards that outline the
actions each party agrees to undertake as part of the project
proposed in the application.
   (c) At a minimum, each project proposed in the application shall
include a provision for an education and training assessment for each
individual of the supervised population who participates in the
project. The assessment may be undertaken by the applicant or by
another entity. A prior assessment of an individual may be used if,
in the determination of the State WIB, its results are accurate. 
The State WIB may delegate the responsibility for determining the
sufficiency of a prior assessment to one or more local workforce
investment boards. 
   (d) Eligible uses of grant funds include, but are not limited to,
vocational training, stipends for trainees, and apprenticeship
opportunities for the supervised population. Supportive services and
job readiness activities shall serve as bridge activities that lead
to enrollment in long-term training programs.
   (e) Preference shall be awarded to applications for the following:

   (1) An application that proposes matching funds, including, but
not limited to, moneys committed by local workforce investment
boards, local governments, and private foundation funds.
   (2) An application submitted by a county that currently
administers or participates in a workforce training program for the
supervised population.
   (3) An application that proposes participation by one or more
nonprofit community-based organizations that serve the supervised
population.
   (f) An application shall meet the following requirements:
   (1) Set a specific purpose for the use of the grant funds, as well
as provide the baseline criteria and metrics by which the overall
success of the grant project can be evaluated.
   (2) Define the specific subset of the supervised population, among
the eligible supervised population that the grant money will serve.
   (3) Define the industry sector or sectors in which the targeted
supervised population will be trained, including the current and
projected workforce within the region for those jobs, the range of
wage rates, and the training and education requirements within those
industry sectors.
   (4) Define the general methodology and training methods proposed
to be used and explain the manner in which the progress of the
targeted supervised population will be monitored during the grant
period.
   (g) As a condition of receiving funds, a grant recipient shall
agree to provide information to the State WIB in sufficient detail to
allow the State WIB to meet the reporting requirements in Section
1234.4.
  SEC. 4.  Section 1234.4 of the Penal Code is amended to read:
   1234.4.  (a) On at least an annual basis, and upon completion of
the grant period, grant recipients shall report to the State WIB
regarding their use of the funds and workforce training program
outcomes.
   (b) By January 1, 2018, the State WIB shall submit a report to the
Legislature using the reports from the grant recipients. The report
shall contain all the following information:
   (1) The overall success of the grant program, based on the goals
and metrics set in the awarded grants.
   (2) An evaluation of the effectiveness of the grant program based
on the goals and metrics set in the awarded grants.
   (3) A recommendation on the long-term viability of local workforce
investment board and county collaborations on workforce training
programs for the supervised population.
   (4) A recommendation on the long-term viability of county
workforce training programs for the supervised population.
   (5) In considering the overall success and effectiveness of the
grant program, the report shall include a discussion of all of the
following: 
   (A) The education and workforce readiness of the supervised
population at the time individual participants entered the program
and how this impacted the types of services needed and offered. 

   (A) 
    (B)  Whether the programs aligned with the workforce
needs of high-demand sectors of the state and regional economies.

   (B) 
    (C)  Whether there was an active job market for the
skills being developed where the member of the supervised population
was likely to be released. 
   (C) 
    (D)  Whether the program increased the number of members
of the supervised population that obtained a marketable and industry
or apprenticeship board-recognized certification, credential, or
degree. 
   (D) 
    (E)  Whether the program increased the numbers of the
supervised population that successfully complete a job readiness
basic skill bridge program and enroll in a long-term training
program. 
   (E) 
    (F)  Whether there were formal or informal networks in
the field that support finding employment upon release from custody.

   (F) 
    (G)  Whether the program led to employment in
occupations with a livable wage. 
   (H) Whether the metrics used to evaluate the individual grants
were sufficiently aligned with the objectives of the program. 
   (c) (1) The requirement for submitting a report imposed under
subdivision (b) is inoperative on January 1, 2021, pursuant to
Section 10231.5 of the Government Code.
   (2) A report to be submitted pursuant to subdivision (b) shall be
submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.
  SEC. 5.  This act is an urgency statute necessary for the immediate
preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within the
meaning of Article IV of the Constitution and shall go into immediate
effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:
   In order to provide cost savings to the state by making the grant
program operate more efficiently as soon as possible, it is necessary
that this act take effect immediately.