ASSEMBLY, No. 1901

STATE OF NEW JERSEY

216th LEGISLATURE

 

PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2014 SESSION

 


 

Sponsored by:

Assemblyman  JOHN J. BURZICHELLI

District 3 (Cumberland, Gloucester and Salem)

Assemblyman  SCOTT T. RUMANA

District 40 (Bergen, Essex, Morris and Passaic)

 

Co-Sponsored by:

Assemblyman Diegnan

 

 

 

 

SYNOPSIS

     Makes certain technical corrections to the "Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act."

 

CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT

     Introduced Pending Technical Review by Legislative Counsel

  


An Act concerning limited liability companies and amending P.L.2012, c.50.

 

     Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:

 

     1.    Section 8 of P.L.2012, c.50 (C.42:2C-8) is amended to read as follows:

     8.    Name.

     a.    The name of a limited liability company shall contain the words "limited liability company" or the abbreviation "L.L.C." or "LLC".  "Limited" may be abbreviated as "Ltd.", and "company" may be abbreviated as "Co.".

     b.    Unless authorized by subsection [c.] d. of this section, the name of a limited liability company shall be distinguishable in the records of the filing office from:

     (1)  the name of each person that is not an individual and that is incorporated, organized, or authorized to transact business in this State; and

     (2)  each name reserved under section 10 of this act.

     c.    Furthermore, the name of a limited liability company shall not contain any word or phrase, or any abbreviation or derivative thereof, the use of which is prohibited or restricted by any other statute of this State, unless the limited liability company has complied with the restrictions.

     d.    A limited liability company may apply to the filing office for authorization to use a name that does not comply with subsection b. of this section.  The filing office shall authorize use of the name applied for if, as to each noncomplying name:

     (1)  the present user, registrant, or owner of the noncomplying name consents in a signed record to the use and submits an undertaking in a form satisfactory to the filing office to change the noncomplying name to a name that complies with subsection b.  of this section and is distinguishable in the records of the filing office from the name applied for; or

     (2)  the applicant delivers to the filing office a certified copy of the final judgment of a court establishing the applicant's right to use in this State the name applied for.

     e.    Subject to section 61, the provisions of this act shall apply to a foreign limited liability company transacting business in this State which has a certificate of authority to transact business in this State or which has applied for a certificate of authority.

(cf: P.L.2012, c.50, s.8)


     2.    Section 11 of P.L.2012, c.50 (C.42:2C-11) is amended to read as follows:

     11.  Operating Agreement; Scope, Function, and Limitations.

     a.    Except as provided in subsections b. and c. of this section, the operating agreement governs:

     (1)  relations among the members as members and between the members and the limited liability company;

     (2)  the rights and duties under this act of a person in the capacity of manager;

     (3)  the activities of the company and the conduct of those activities; and

     (4)  the means and conditions for amending the operating agreement.

     b.    To the extent the operating agreement does not otherwise provide for a matter described in subsection a. of this section, this act governs the matter.

     c.    An operating agreement may not:

     (1)  vary a limited liability company's capacity under section 5 of this act to sue and be sued in its own name;

     (2)  vary the law applicable under section 6 of this act;

     (3)  vary the power of the court under section 21 of this act;

     (4)  subject to subsections d. through g. of this section, eliminate the duty of loyalty, the duty of care, or any other fiduciary duty;

     (5)  subject to subsections d. through g. of this section, eliminate the contractual obligation of good faith and fair dealing under subsection d. of section 39 of this act;

     (6)  unreasonably restrict the duties and rights stated in section 40 of this act;

     (7)  vary the power of a court to decree dissolution in the circumstances specified in paragraphs (4) and (5) of subsection a. of section 48 of this act;

     (8)  vary the requirement to wind up a limited liability company's business as specified in subsection a. and paragraph (1) of subsection b. of section 49 of this act;

     (9)  unreasonably restrict the right of a member to maintain an action under Article 9 (sections 67 through 72 of this act);

     (10) restrict the right to approve a merger, conversion, or domestication under section 86 of this act to a member that will have personal liability with respect to a surviving, converted, or domesticated organization; or

     (11) except as otherwise provided in subsection b. of section 13 of this act, restrict the rights under this act of a person other than a member or manager.

     d.    If not manifestly unreasonable, the operating agreement may:

     (1)  restrict or eliminate the duty:

     (a)   as required in paragraph (1) of subsection b. and subsection [g.] i. of section 39 of this act, to account to the limited liability company and to hold as trustee for it any property, profit, or benefit derived by the member in the conduct or winding up of the company's business, from a use by the member of the company's property, or from the appropriation of a limited liability company opportunity;

     (b)  as required in paragraph (2) of subsection b. and subsection [g.] i. of section 39 of this act, to refrain from dealing with the company in the conduct or winding up of the company's business as or on behalf of a party having an interest adverse to the company; and

     (c)   as required by paragraph (3) of subsection b. and subsection [g.] i. of section 39 of this act, to refrain from competing with the company in the conduct of the company's business before the dissolution of the company;

     (2)  identify specific types or categories of activities that do not violate the duty of loyalty;

     (3)  alter the duty of care, except to authorize intentional misconduct or knowing violation of law;

     (4)  alter any other fiduciary duty, including eliminating particular aspects of that duty; and

     (5)  prescribe the standards by which to measure the performance of the contractual obligation of good faith and fair dealing under subsection d. and subsection [g.] i. of section 39 of this act.

     e.    The operating agreement may specify the method by which a specific act or transaction that would otherwise violate the duty of loyalty may be authorized or ratified by one or more disinterested and independent persons after full disclosure of all material facts.

     f.     To the extent the operating agreement of a member-managed limited liability company expressly relieves a member of a responsibility that the member would otherwise have under this act and imposes the responsibility on one or more other members, the operating agreement may, to the benefit of the member that the operating agreement relieves of the responsibility, also eliminate or limit any fiduciary duty that would have pertained to the responsibility.

     g.    The operating agreement may alter or eliminate the indemnification for a member or manager provided by section 38 of this act and may eliminate or limit a [member] member's or manager's liability to the limited liability company and members for money damages, except for:

     (1)  breach of the duty of loyalty;

     (2)  a financial benefit received by the member or manager to which the member or manager is not entitled;

     (3)  a breach of a duty under section 36 of this act;

     (4)  intentional infliction of harm on the company or a member; or

     (5)  an intentional violation of criminal law.

     h.    The court shall decide any claim under [paragraph (1) of] subsection d. of this section that a term of an operating agreement is manifestly unreasonable.  The court:

     (1)  shall make its determination as of the time the challenged term became part of the operating agreement and by considering only circumstances existing at that time; and

     (2)  may invalidate the term only if, in light of the purposes and activities of the limited liability company, it is readily apparent that:

     (a)   the objective of the term is unreasonable; or

     (b)  the term is an unreasonable means to achieve the provision's objective.

     i.     This act is to be liberally construed to give the maximum effect to the principle of freedom of contract and to the enforceability of operating agreements.

(cf: P.L.2012, c.50, s.11)

 

     3.    Section 91 of P.L.2012, c.50 (C.42:2C-91) is amended to read as follows:

     91.  Application to Existing Relationships.

     a.    Before [the first day of the 18th month next following the enactment date of this act] March 1, 2014, this act governs only:

     (1)  a limited liability company formed on or after the effective date of this act; and

     (2)  a limited liability company formed before the effective date of this act, which elects, in the manner provided in its operating agreement or by law for amending the operating agreement, to be subject to this act.

     b.    On and after [the first day of the 18th month next following the enactment date of this act] March 1, 2014, this act governs all limited liability companies.

(cf: P.L.2012, c.50, s.91)

 

     4.    Section 95 of P.L.2012, c.50 is amended to read as follows:

     95.  Repeals.  Effective on [the first day of the 18 month next following the enactment date of this act] March 1, 2014, the following are repealed:

     P.L.1993, c.210 (C.42:2B-1 et seq.); Section 22 of P.L.1997, c.139 (C.42:2B-8.1);

     Section 14 of P.L.1997, c.139 (C.42:2B-24.1); and

     Sections 1 and 2 of P.L.2003, c.12 (C.42:2B-49.1 and 42:2B-49.2).

(cf: P.L. 2012, c.50, s.95)


     5.    This act shall take effect immediately, and shall be retroactive to September 19, 2012.

 

 

STATEMENT

 

This bill makes certain technical corrections to the "Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act," enacted in 2012.  In particular, the bill would correct certain inadvertent cross-referencing errors contained in the act, and specifies that the act's effective date is March 1, 2014, which is the first day of the 18th month following the date of enactment of the 2012 act.  In making these corrections, the bill provides clarification as to when the act begins to govern the operations of various limited liability companies, and when certain earlier laws regarding limited liability companies will be repealed.